21,998 downloads - November 30, 2015
We have switched to admin only, please email markwdilley@gmail if you would like to edit.

Suggestions

From Universal Edit Button

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Implemented suggestions)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
-
< ''[[Universal_Edit_Button:Community_Portal|Community Portal]]''
+
< ''[[Universal_Edit_Button:Community_Portal|Community Portal]]'' {{RightTOC}}
-
{{RightTOC}}
+
== Unimplemented suggestions ==
== Unimplemented suggestions ==

Revision as of 07:25, 20 June 2008

< Community Portal

Contents

Unimplemented suggestions

Additional Image Ideas

  • One simple idea would be to create an icon that is more representative of an "electronic" or "online" era rather than using the traditional "pencil" icon which represents a "paper" era. A suggestion would be to have an icon showing a few keys on a keyboard with the Enter key (showing the arrow <--) depressed. Color scheme I'm unsure of, but it might be one way of showing the action for "edit" rather than a pencil writing on a page. I realize that the pencil is pretty standard for editing something across many applications and on the Web, but it's just an idea.
the logo for this wiki represents about 3/4 the ideas we had during the last 15 months of talking about this idea. We look forward to fresh ideas and designs! :-) MarkDilley


Rename the Firefox Add-on...

...from wiki auto-discovery button to Universal Edit Button

The rel and/or type should be...

(Right now we're using rel="link" and type="application/x-wiki" - which would become "application/wiki" once we register whatever we settle on. When we're settled, see http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/mediatypes.pl to begin that process.)

To fit better with the defined purpose of the link tag and its attributes, I think a better way to format the edit link would be like this:

<link rel="edit" type="text/html" title="Edit this page!" href="wiki?edit=WelcomeVisitors"/>

The content-type of the response is text/html typically, and the relationship of the link to the current page is that you're going to edit it. --Mryall 23:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm wondering about application/x-wiki & application/wiki, on two levels. One is again reluctance to label this as being inherently wiki-related.

The other has more to do with what type is supposed to specify in the first place. From looking through the RFCs, it sounds like type is intended to describe the data being returned, rather than a function. If that's true, i imagine it would have to be able to be different for different systems. An edit page might HTML here (text/html), XHTML there (application/xhtml+xml), or not even a web page, but data that gets dynamically used to offer the ability to edit (e.g. in Wagn; not sure what type of data it is).

If the spec is ok with the label describing the function, then what about application/edit? --John Abbe

There's always crazy possibilities like "text/html; content-disposition=edit" ... --Brion Vibber

More than one editable item on the page

Handle websites (e.g. MediaWiki, Wagn) that have more than one editable item per page.

Add multiple <link...> tags of whatever format we end up with. Then if the browser finds more than one, a menu of those editable items appears when they click on the edit button (a title= key/value pair in the code determines what appears in the menu for each item. --John Abbe 06:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I thought about this before the release today, and I am not sure if this the best option. It is of course the natural way to do it, but it may be too confusing, at least until people get used to the idea of an address bar button. I think it may be best to link to the most reasonable default choice (e.g., in WP the edit link of the page, not of the sections). If no such thing exists it may be best for sites to point to a page the explains the situation, and then offers the relevant links. Ehud Lamm 06:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Could be a preference in the add-on.--John Abbe 06:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Non-REST interfaces

Handle websites that don't use a plain URL to trigger editing.

Implemented suggestions

Tooltip should be more explicit

(Implemented in the spec anyway; websites can each do whatever they like of course.)

I know this may seem really, really minor, but look at the tooltips for the address bar icons in Firefox 3:

  • RSS icon: "Subscribe to this page..."
  • Bookmark (star) icon: "Bookmark this page"
  • Universal Edit icon: "Edit"

For the sake of consistency and clarity, that last should probably be "Edit this page..."

Part of the reason for this is that people are not used to being able to edit pages directly. "Edit" could mean something else -- maybe "Edit URL". Be unambiguous.


Personal tools